{
  "article": "<section class=\"plain-english-door\" aria-label=\"Introduction\">\n  <p class=\"plain-english-door__kicker\">Introduction</p>\n  <h3>Bereavement visions as psychological mechanism</h3>\n  <p class=\"plain-english-door__lead\">This is a context marker for bereavement-vision psychology, not a separate scored objection. The richer hallucination and cognitive-dissonance row carries the main alternative. Keep this row as a reminder that grief experiences matter, but should not be counted twice.</p>\n  <div class=\"plain-english-door__grid\">\n  <div class=\"plain-english-door__panel\">\n    <h4>Why it matters</h4>\n    <p>It keeps an important psychological idea visible without duplicating the evidence.</p>\n  </div>\n  <div class=\"plain-english-door__panel\">\n    <h4>What this does not mean</h4>\n    <p>It does not add another independent penalty against the resurrection.</p>\n  </div>\n  <div class=\"plain-english-door__panel\">\n    <h4>How it pressures the map</h4>\n    <p>It presses the map toward careful accounting, not louder repetition.</p>\n  </div>\n  <div class=\"plain-english-door__panel\">\n    <h4>Go deeper</h4>\n    <p>The Full Dossier explains why this row stays under the hallucination-alternative cluster.</p>\n  </div>\n  </div>\n</section>\n\n<div class=\"detail-section-heading\">Existing Governance Note</div>\n<div class=\"detail-article-block\">\nThis row overlaps the richer hallucination/cognitive-dissonance anchor `E-ALT-HALL-2`. Keep it as duplicate/context until maintainer decide whether it should merge, become a child note, or be rewritten around a distinct bereavement-vision datum.\n</div>",
  "axioms": [
    "A6",
    "A7"
  ],
  "bayes_factors": {},
  "category": "Historical Jesus / Alternatives",
  "citations": [
    "Lüdemann, G. (1994). The Resurrection of Jesus.",
    "Grimes, A. (1995). Bereavement hallucinations (clinical surveys).",
    "Taves, A. (2016). Revelatory Events."
  ],
  "counts_in_cache": true,
  "evidence_id": "E-ALT-HALL-1",
  "visual_asset": {
    "src": "assets/evidence-viewer/evidence-images/bereavement_visions_psychological_interpretation.png",
    "title": "Bereavement visions as psychological mechanism visual overview",
    "alt": "AI-generated conceptual visualization for Bereavement visions as psychological mechanism. Illustrative only, not experimental data.",
    "caption": "AI-generated conceptual / comparative visualization ? illustrative only, not experimental data. Presented inside a Christian evidence map.",
    "width": 1448,
    "height": 1086
  },
  "major_category": "History",
  "metadata": {
    "category": "Historical Jesus / Alternatives",
    "last_updated": "2025-09-12",
    "major_category": "History",
    "rev": 3,
    "sub_category": "Alternative Explanations",
    "cluster_role": "hallucination_duplicate_context",
    "cluster_note": "Active legacy BFs cleared to prevent double-counting hallucination evidence already represented by E-ALT-HALL-2.",
    "scoring_note": "Active legacy BFs cleared during resurrection-cluster governance pass; keep outside independent scoring unless rewritten as distinct bereavement-vision evidence.",
    "legacy_bayes_factors_status": "archived_not_runtime_scored",
    "legacy_bayes_factors_note": "Legacy Bayes factors are retained for audit history only. Runtime scoring uses the active bayes_factors field.",
    "legacy_bayes_factors_reviewed": "2026-05-17",
    "dependency_cluster_id": "resurrection_alternative_explanations",
    "dependency_cluster_label": "Resurrection alternative explanations",
    "dependency_cluster_role": "context_summary",
    "dependency_weight_class": "unweighted_context",
    "cap_eligible": false,
    "cap_exempt_reason": "context_row_unweighted",
    "cap_family": "resurrection_rival_pressure",
    "cap_notes": "This row preserves unweighted Resurrection-rival context and does not add independent BF on top of scored rows.",
    "cap_profile": "exact_duplicate",
    "governance_reviewed": "2026-05-28",
    "cap_profile_note": "Hidden/merged duplicate rows must not stack if reactivated without review.",
    "evidence_function": "unweighted_explanatory",
    "directness": "explanatory_only",
    "dependency_cluster": "resurrection_alternative_explanations",
    "dependency_role": "context_summary",
    "counts_as_direct_resurrection": false,
    "counts_as_direct_christ_identity": false,
    "counts_as_direct_logos_synthesis": false
  },
  "sub_category": "Alternative Explanations",
  "summary": "Datum: Duplicate/context candidate under `E-ALT-HALL-2`; do not score independently until the hallucination-alternative cluster is reconciled.",
  "positive_apologetic": {
    "label": "Rival-pressure use",
    "title": "This is unweighted context for the visionary-alternative lane.",
    "key_point": "The row keeps bereavement-vision psychology visible without giving it a second score on top of the main hallucination/visionary alternative anchor.",
    "conversation_move": "Use it as a reminder that the visionary hypothesis is not mere handwaving. Then keep scoring discipline by reading it under the active hallucination-alternative cluster rather than stacking it independently.",
    "caveat": "Because this is a duplicate/context candidate, it should not be treated as an additional active argument unless the cluster is later reconciled."
  },
  "counter_pressure": {
    "title": "Visionary mechanisms matter, but they must not be double-counted into certainty.",
    "text": "Bereavement visions are a real part of the rival explanation space. They help explain why grieving people may report powerful experiences. But this row is contextual: it keeps the mechanism visible without letting the same psychological explanation become multiple independent blows against Resurrection.",
    "path": "Use this as a map marker. Say plainly that grief and visionary experience are real. Then ask whether this mechanism explains only private consolation or also the full Resurrection pattern: public proclamation, bodily categories, empty-tomb claims, Paul, James, and worship. Keep the mechanism visible, but do not count it twice under different labels."
  },
  "tags": [
    "Stage-5",
    "Competitor-Enrichment"
  ],
  "tilt": "negative",
  "title": "Bereavement visions as psychological mechanism",
  "type": "atomic",
  "hypothesis_ref": [],
  "legacy_bayes_factors": {
    "H-ALT-AUTH-DISP": {
      "bayes_factor_original": 0,
      "bf_max": 0.15,
      "bf_min": -0.15,
      "log10BF": 0,
      "rationale": "Conservative steelman for alternative; weight capped; see citations & counterpoints."
    },
    "H-ALT-IMPOSTER": {
      "bayes_factor_original": 0,
      "bf_max": 0.15,
      "bf_min": -0.15,
      "log10BF": 0,
      "rationale": "Conservative steelman for alternative; weight capped; see citations & counterpoints."
    },
    "H-ALT-SPIRITUAL": {
      "bayes_factor_original": 0,
      "bf_max": 0.15,
      "bf_min": -0.15,
      "log10BF": 0,
      "rationale": "Conservative steelman for alternative; weight capped; see citations & counterpoints."
    },
    "H-ALT-THEFT": {
      "bayes_factor_original": 0,
      "bf_max": 0.15,
      "bf_min": -0.15,
      "log10BF": 0,
      "rationale": "Conservative steelman for alternative; weight capped; see citations & counterpoints."
    },
    "H-ALT-UNKNOWN": {
      "bayes_factor_original": 0,
      "bf_max": 0.15,
      "bf_min": -0.15,
      "log10BF": 0,
      "rationale": "Conservative steelman for alternative; weight capped; see citations & counterpoints."
    },
    "H-ALT-WRONG-TOMB": {
      "bayes_factor_original": 0,
      "bf_max": 0.15,
      "bf_min": -0.15,
      "log10BF": 0,
      "rationale": "Conservative steelman for alternative; weight capped; see citations & counterpoints."
    },
    "H-RES": {
      "bayes_factor_original": 0,
      "bf_max": 0.15,
      "bf_min": -0.15,
      "log10BF": 0,
      "rationale": "Conservative steelman for alternative; weight capped; see citations & counterpoints."
    }
  },
  "last_updated": "2025-09-15T19:40:08.532560Z",
  "status": "v2",
  "bf_status": "pending_enrichment",
  "disposition_status": "duplicate_candidate"
}