Evidence Item - v0.7
Appearance diversity as a partial answer to hallucination-only explanations
E-ANS-HALLUCINATION-APPEARANCE-DIVERSITY
Visual overview: Appearance diversity as a partial answer to hallucination-only explanations visual overview
Classification
- Evidence ID
- E-ANS-HALLUCINATION-APPEARANCE-DIVERSITY
- Corpus/version
- v0.7
- Stage
- Not explicitly stage-mapped in current stage_flow.
- Category
- Defeater Answers
- Major category
- History
- Sub-category
- Resurrection Alternatives
- BF status
- ready
- Scoring label
- Scored row with active Bayes factors
Navigation
Primary Datum
Datum: hallucination and bereavement-vision explanations must account for the diversity and public shape of the early appearance claims.
Scoring / Hypothesis Pressure
| Hypothesis | log10BF | Min | Max | Rationale |
|---|---|---|---|---|
H-ALT-HALLUCINATION | -0.05 | -0.07 | -0.03 | The diversity and public shape of the early appearance claims modestly pressure hallucination-only explanations, while leaving visionary-experience and mixed naturalistic models visible. |
Dependency / Cap Metadata
- dependency_cluster_id
- hallucination_visionary_experience
- dependency_cluster_role
- counter
- dependency_cluster
- hallucination_visionary_experience
- dependency_role
- counter
- cap_profile
- rival_pressure
- evidence_function
- defeater_answer
- directness
- supporting
Apologetic Note
- label
- Partial answer
- title
- A possible mechanism still has to fit the pattern.
- key point
- Visionary experience is real, but the hallucination explanation must account for the range of appearance claims, named witnesses, skeptical conversions, and bodily-resurrection proclamation.
- conversation move
- Grant the strongest point first: bereavement and visionary experiences happen. Then ask whether that mechanism explains the whole early Christian appearance pattern without borrowing from other alternatives.
- caveat
- This is not direct Resurrection proof. It is a bounded answer to one rival explanation.
Scripture Passage
1 Corinthians 15:3-8; Luke 24; John 20-21
Caveats / Notes
- Source note
- Use appearance-list, bereavement-vision, and resurrection-alternative scholarship carefully; this row pressures hallucination-only explanations without denying visionary-experience data.
- Cap notes
- Paired answer to hallucination/visionary-experience pressure. It may contribute only bounded alternative-collapse support and must not be routed as direct Resurrection evidence.
- Scoring note
- Small capped pressure against H-ALT-HALLUCINATION only. No direct H-RESURRECTION BF.
Citations
- 1 Corinthians 15:3-8.
- Dale C. Allison Jr., The Resurrection of Jesus: Apologetics, Polemics, History (Bloomsbury, 2021).
- Gerd Ludemann, The Resurrection of Jesus: History, Experience, Theology (Fortress, 1994), as skeptical/visionary pressure.
- N. T. Wright, The Resurrection of the Son of God (Fortress, 2003).
- Michael R. Licona, The Resurrection of Jesus: A New Historiographical Approach (IVP Academic, 2010).
- Gary R. Habermas, On the Resurrection, Volume 1: Evidences (B&H Academic, 2024).
- Terence Nichols, Death and Afterlife: A Theological Introduction (Brazos, 2010), for wider afterlife and vision-context cautions.
Recommended Citation
The Signal Evidence Dataset, "Appearance diversity as a partial answer to hallucination-only explanations," Evidence ID: E-ANS-HALLUCINATION-APPEARANCE-DIVERSITY, Version 0.7. Accessed [access date]. https://logos-signal.org/evidence/E-ANS-HALLUCINATION-APPEARANCE-DIVERSITY/
Machine-Readable Source
This page is generated from the public evidence mirror without recalculating or changing scores.