Evidence Item - v0.7
Method — how we weigh competing explanations
E-COSMO-BGV
Visual overview: Evidence Viewer
Classification
- Evidence ID
- E-COSMO-BGV
- Corpus/version
- v0.7
- Stage
- stage2
- Category
- Evidence Governance
- Major category
- Methodology / Signal Core
- Sub-category
- Bayesian Method
- BF status
- unweighted_explanatory
- Scoring label
- Contextual / unweighted / no active Bayes factor.
Navigation
Primary Datum
The Signal weighs evidence by relative fit: what was observed, which explanations are live, and how expected the observation is under each view. A clue gets weight when it is less surprising under one explanation than under its rivals. This row is unweighted methodology, meant to make the public scoring process clear, bounded, and open to audit.
Scoring / Hypothesis Pressure
Contextual / unweighted / no active Bayes factor.
Dependency / Cap Metadata
- dependency_cluster_id
- methodological_controls
- dependency_cluster_role
- methodology
- dependency_cluster
- methodological_controls
- dependency_role
- methodology
- cap_profile
- manual_review
- evidence_function
- methodological_pressure
- directness
- methodological
Citations
- Jaynes, *Probability Theory*; Swinburne, methodology chapters.
Recommended Citation
The Signal Evidence Dataset, "Method — how we weigh competing explanations," Evidence ID: E-COSMO-BGV, Version 0.7. Accessed [access date]. https://logos-signal.org/evidence/E-COSMO-BGV/
Machine-Readable Source
This page is generated from the public evidence mirror without recalculating or changing scores.