Primary Datum
Datum: some simulation models propose testable lattice-like artifacts such as anisotropy or discretization signatures.
Scoring / Hypothesis Pressure
Contextual / unweighted / no active Bayes factor.
Dependency / Cap Metadata
- dependency_cluster_id
- simulationism_rival_case
- dependency_cluster_role
- context_summary
- dependency_cluster
- simulationism_rival_case
- dependency_role
- context_summary
- cap_profile
- manual_review
- evidence_function
- unweighted_explanatory
- directness
- explanatory_only
Counter-Pressure
- title
- Numerical lattice signatures proposals is context, not an extra scored proof.
- text
- This row helps readers understand the simulationism rival case family, but it should not be treated as independent BF pressure on top of its child or sibling rows. Simulation arguments can shift the question upward rather than answer it.
- path
- Use it to orient the question and then move to the scored rows that carry the evidential weight. Use it to ask what explains the simulator, the laws, and the moral-personal field.
Caveats / Notes
- Cap notes
- This row provides unweighted world-religion/rival context and does not add independent BF on top of scored rows.
- Cluster note
- Simulation/information seat deferred: do not proxy-score this row under H-IDEALISM, H-GOD, or H-DEISM until a dedicated simulation/information hypothesis seat is approved.
- Scoring note
- Batch 2 source/article cleanup; no non-neutral Bayes factors applied.
- Disposition note
- Batch 2 cleanup: simulation lattice-test proposals need a simulation/information hypothesis seat or explicit unweighted treatment. Do not use H-IDEALISM, H-GOD, H-GOD-OT, or H-DEISM as sloppy proxies. Active neutral placeholder refs/BFs were cleared.
Machine-Readable Source
This page is generated from the public evidence mirror without recalculating or changing scores.