Evidence Item - v0.7
Unreasonable effectiveness of mathematics — fit between math and the world
E-UNREASONABLE-MATH
Evidence Item - v0.7
E-UNREASONABLE-MATH
Visual overview: Unreasonable effectiveness of mathematics visual overview

Datum: mathematics is unreasonably effective in describing the physical world.
| Hypothesis | log10BF | Min | Max | Rationale |
|---|---|---|---|---|
H-GOD | 0.02 | -0.02 | 0.06 | Mathematical intelligibility can fit a rational-order theistic story, but this item does not directly establish agency, revelation, or personal theism. |
H-IDEALISM | 0.03 | -0.01 | 0.07 | Deep mathematical intelligibility gives mild support to mind-friendly or idea-like metaphysics, but it is not specific enough to strongly favor idealism. |
H-NATURALISM | -0.02 | -0.06 | 0.03 | The datum mildly pressures brute or deflationary naturalist accounts of mathematical fit, while remaining compatible with mathematically realist naturalism and selection-effect explanations. |
H-PLATONIC-MATHEMATICAL-STRUCTURALISM | 0.07 | 0.02 | 0.12 | The repeated success of abstract mathematics in describing physical structure is more expected if mathematical structure is discovery-like and reality is mathematically intelligible, though selection effects and model-building constrain the score. |
The Signal Evidence Dataset, "Unreasonable effectiveness of mathematics — fit between math and the world," Evidence ID: E-UNREASONABLE-MATH, Version 0.7. Accessed [access date]. https://logos-signal.org/evidence/E-UNREASONABLE-MATH/
This page is generated from the public evidence mirror without recalculating or changing scores.